PEP intelligence
Political positions, jurisdictions, tenure and historical PEP status — structured with temporal context.
Intelligence
Entity intelligence, structured.
People, organisations, positions and events — represented through evidence-backed claims rather than static records.
The graph
From records to intelligence.
A name tells you who might be a match. Averis builds the context around that name — connecting identities, relationships, events and evidence over time, with every material claim traceable to its source.
Entity·Relationship·Event·Claim·Evidence·Source·Time
Averis GraphGraph architecture
Temporal context
2014
Ownership established
2016
Public office commenced
2019
Office concluded
2021
Regulatory event closed
Entity structure
PERSON
Provenance path
Intelligence domains
Sanctions intelligence
Sanctions exposure connected to entities and relationships, with traceable claims.
Financial-crime intelligence
Adverse media and financial-crime intelligence linked through claims, not unsupported conclusions.
Entity and relationship intelligence
People, organisations, ownership and associates as a connected graph.
Regulatory intelligence
Regulatory events and classifications grounded in authoritative sources where available.
Court and legal intelligence
Court events and legal proceedings with evidence and provenance preserved.
Corporate context
Company registrations, directorships and organisational history.
Historical intelligence
Past roles and relationships retained — not overwritten when circumstances change.
Evidence and provenance
Every material claim connected to the evidence and sources that support or challenge it.
Coverage expands by jurisdiction and source. Depth before breadth.
Evidence
Every conclusion should have a trail.
What Averis believes is separable from why — provenance, confidence and contradictory information preserved.
- 01Source
The register, document or publication of origin.
- 02Evidence
The specific extract that supports or challenges a claim.
- 03Claim
The assertion, with confidence and lifecycle status.
- 04Entity
The person, organisation or relationship described.
Claim lifecycle
Supported
Evidence supports the claim.
Challenged
Contradictory evidence exists.
Corroborated
Independent evidence supports the claim.
Superseded
A newer claim replaces this state.
Retracted
Determined to be incorrect.
Continuous intelligence
The operating engine behind the graph.
Discover→Resolve→Enrich→Verify→Corroborate→Monitor
Discovery & extraction
Source discovery, document understanding and entity extraction — preserving original evidence.
Resolution & enrichment
Identity resolution, differentiation and relationship discovery — finding what distinguishes an entity.
Evidence & verification
Verification, source quality, corroboration and conflict detection — testing whether sources support claims.
Investigation & governance
Investigator briefing, match assessment, audit and human review where judgement is required.
Operating principle
No individual agent is the source of truth. The intelligence graph and its evidence model are.